|
AA's are always asking: "Where did the Twelve
Steps come from?" In the last analysis, perhaps nobody
knows. Yet some of the events which led to their
formulation are as clear to me as though they took place
yesterday.
So far as people were concerned, the main channels
of inspiration for our Steps were three in number -- the
Oxford Groups, Dr. William D. Silkworth of Townes
Hospital and the famed psychologist, William James,
called by some the father of modern psychology. The
story of how these streams of influence were brought
together and how they led to the writing of our Twelve
Steps is exciting and in spots downright incredible.
Many of us will remember the Oxford Groups as a
modern evangelical movement which flourished in the
1920's and early 30's, led by a one-time Lutheran
minister, Dr. Frank Buchman. The Oxford Groups of that
day threw heavy emphasis on personal work, one member
with another. AA's Twelfth Step had its origin in that
vital practice. The moral backbone of the "O.G." was
absolute honesty, absolute purity, absolute
unselfishness and absolute love. They also practiced a
type of confession, which they called "sharing"; the
making of amends for harms done they called
"restitution." They believed deeply in their "quiet
time," a meditation practiced by groups and individuals
alike, in which the guidance of God was sought for every
detail of living, great or small.
These basic ideas were not new; they could have
been found elsewhere. But the saving thing for us first
alcoholics who contacted the Oxford Groupers was that
they laid great stress on these particular principles.
And fortunate for us was the fact that the Groupers took
special pains not to interfere with one's personal
religious views. Their society, like ours later on, saw
the need to be strictly non-denominational.
In the late summer of 1934, my well-loved
alcoholic friend and schoolmate "Ebby" had fallen in
with these good folks and had promptly sobered up. Being
an alcoholic, and rather on the obstinate side, he
hadn't been able to "buy" all the Oxford Group ideas and
attitudes. Nevertheless, he was moved by their deep
sincerity and felt mighty grateful for the fact that
their ministrations had, for the time being, lifted his
obsession to drink.
When he arrived in New York in the late fall of
1934, Ebby thought at once of me. On a bleak November
day he rang up. Soon he was looking at me across our
kitchen table at 182 Clinton Street, Brooklyn, New York.
As I remember that conversation, he constantly used
phrases like these: "I found I couldn't run my own
life;" "I had to get honest with myself and somebody
else;" "I had to make restitution for the damage I had
done;" "I had to pray to God for guidance and strength,
even though I wasn't sure there was any God;" "And after
I'd tried hard to do these things I found that my
craving for alcohol left." Then over and over Ebby would
say something like this: "Bill, it isn't a bit like
being on the water wagon. You don't fight the desire to
drink - you get released from it. I never had such a
feeling before."
Such was the sum of what Ebby had extracted from
his Oxford Group friends and had transmitted to me that
day. While these simple ideas were not new, they
certainly hit me like tons of brick. Today we understand
just why that was...one alcoholic was talking to another
as no one else can.
Two or three weeks later, December 11th to be
exact, I staggered into the Charles B. Townes Hospital,
that famous drying-out emporium on Central Park West,
New York City. I'd been there before, so I knew and
already loved the doctor in charge -- Dr. Silkworth. It
was he who was soon to contribute a very great idea
without which AA could never had succeeded. For years he
had been proclaiming alcoholism an illness, an obsession
of the mind coupled with an allergy of the body. By now
I knew this meant me. I also understood what a fatal
combination these twin ogres could be. Of course, I'd
once hoped to be among the small percentage of victims
who now and then escape their vengeance. But this
outside hope was now gone. I was about to hit bottom.
That verdict of science -- the obsession that condemned
me to drink and the allergy that condemned me to die --
was about to do the trick. That's where the medical
science, personified by this benign little doctor, began
to fit it in. Held in the hands of one alcoholic talking
to the next, this double-edged truth was a sledgehammer
which could shatter the tough alcoholic's ego at depth
and lay him wide open to the grace of God.
In my case it was of course Dr. Silkworth who
swung the sledge while my friend Ebby carried to me the
spiritual principles and the grace which brought on my
sudden spiritual awakening at the hospital three days
later. I immediately knew that I was a free man. And
with this astonishing experience came a feeling of
wonderful certainty that great numbers of alcoholics
might one day enjoy the priceless gift which had been
bestowed upon me.
Third
Influence
At this point a third stream of influence entered
my life through the pages of William James' book,
"Varieties of Religious Experience." Somebody had
brought it to my hospital room. Following my sudden
experience, Dr. Silkworth had take great pains to
convince me that I was not hallucinated. But William
James did even more. Not only, he said, could spiritual
experiences make people saner, they could transform men
and women so that they could do, feel and believe what
had hitherto been impossible to them. It mattered little
whether these awakenings were sudden or gradual, their
variety could be almost infinite. But the biggest payoff
of that noted book was this: in most of the cases
described, those who had been transformed were hopeless
people. In some controlling area of their lives they had
met absolute defeat. Well, that was me all right. In
complete defeat, with no hope or faith whatever, I had
made an appeal to a higher Power. I had taken Step One
of today's AA program -- "admitted we were powerless
over alcohol, that our lives had become unmanageable."
I'd also take Step Three - "made a decision to turn our
will and our lives over to God as we understood him."
Thus was I set free. It was just as simple, yet just as
mysterious, as that.
These realizations were so exciting that I
instantly joined up with the Oxford Groups. But to their
consternation I insisted on devoting myself exclusively
to drunks. This was disturbing to the O.G.'s on two
counts. Firstly, they wanted to help save the whole
world. Secondly, their luck with drunks had been poor.
Just as I joined they had been working over a batch of
alcoholics who had proved disappointing indeed. One of
them, it was rumored, had flippantly cast his shoe
through a valuable stained glass window of an Episcopal
church across the alley from O.G. headquarters. Neither
did they take kindly to my repeated declaration that it
shouldn't take long to sober up all the drunks in the
world. They rightly declared that my conceit was still
immense.
Something Missing
After some six months of violent exertion with
scores of alcoholics which I found at a nearby mission
and Townes Hospital, it began to look like the Groupers
were right. I hadn't sobered up anybody. In Brooklyn we
always had a houseful of drinkers living with us,
sometimes as many as five. My valiant wife, Lois, once
arrived home from work to find three of them fairly
tight. They were whaling each other with two-by-fours.
Though events like these slowed me down somewhat, the
persistent conviction that a way to sobriety could be
found never seemed to leave me. There was, though, one
bright spot. My sponsor, Ebby, still clung precariously
to his new-found sobriety.
What was the reason for all these fiascoes? If
Ebby and I could achieve sobriety, why couldn't all the
rest find it too? Some of those we'd worked on certainly
wanted to get well. We speculated day and night why
nothing much had happened to them. Maybe they couldn't
stand the spiritual pace of the Oxford Group's four
absolutes of honesty, purity, unselfishness, and love.
In fact some of the alcoholics declared that this was
the trouble. The aggressive pressure upon them to get
good overnight would make them fly high as geese for a
few weeks and then flop dismally. They complained, too,
about another form of coercion - something the Oxford
Groupers called "guidance for others." A "team" composed
of non-alcoholic Groupers would sit down with an
alcoholic and after a "quiet time" would come up with
precise instructions as to how the alcoholic should run
his own life. As grateful as we were to our O.G.
friends, this was sometimes tough to take. It obviously
had something to do with the wholesale skidding that
went on.
But this wasn't the entire reason for failure.
After months I saw the trouble was mainly in me. I had
become very aggressive, very cocksure. I talked a lot
about my sudden spiritual experience, as though it was
something very special. I had been playing the double
role of teacher and preacher. In my exhortations I'd
forgotten all about the medical side of our malady, and
that need for deflation at depth so emphasized by
William James had been neglected. We weren't using that
medical sledgehammer that Dr. Silkworth had so
providentially given us.
Finally, one day, Dr. Silkworth took me back down
to my right size. Said he, "Bill, why don't you quit
talking so much about that bright light experience of
yours, it sounds too crazy. Though I'm convince that
nothing but better morals will make alcoholics really
well, I do think you have got the cart before the horse.
The point is that alcoholics won't buy all this moral
exhortation until they convince themselves that they
must. If I were you I'd go after them on the medical
basis first. While it is never done any good for me to
tell them how fatal their malady is, it might be a very
different story if you, a formerly hopeless alcoholic,
gave them the bad news. Bemuse of this identification
you naturally have with alcoholics, you might be able to
penetrate where I can't. Give them the medical business
first, and give it to them hard. This might soften them
up so they will accept the principles that will really
get them well."
Then
Came Akron
Shortly after this history-making conversation, I
found myself in Akron, Ohio, on a business venture which
promptly collapsed. Alone in the town, I was scared to
death of getting drunk. I was no longer a teacher or a
preacher, I was an alcoholic who knew that he needed
another alcoholic as much as that one could possibly
need me. Driven by that urge, I was soon face to face
with Dr. Bob. It was at once evident that Dr. Bob knew
more of the spiritual things than I did. He also had
been in touch with the Oxford Groupers at Akron. But
somehow he simply couldn't get sober. Following Dr.
Silkworth's advice, I used the medical sledgehammer. I
told him what alcoholism was and just how fatal it could
be. Apparently this did something to Dr. Bob. On June
10, 1935, he sobered up, never to drink again. When, in
1939, Dr. Bob's story first appeared in the book,
Alcoholics Anonymous, he put one paragraph of it in
italics. Speaking of me, he said: "Of far more
importance was the fact that he was the first living
human with whom I had ever talked, who knew what he was
talking about in regard to alcoholism from actual
experience."
The
Missing Link
Dr. Silkworth had indeed supplied us the missing
link without which the chain of principles now forged
into our Twelve Steps could never have been complete.
Then and there, the spark that was to become Alcoholics
Anonymous had been struck.
During the next three years after Dr. Bob's
recovery our growing groups at Akron, New York and
Cleveland evolved the so-called word-of-mouth program of
our pioneering time. As we commenced to form a society
separate from the Oxford Group, we began to state our
principles something like this:
1. We admitted
that we were powerless over alcohol
2. We got honest with ourselves
3. We got honest with another person, in confidence
4. We made amends for harms done others
5. We worked with other alcoholics without demand
for prestige or money
6. We prayed to God to help us to do these things as
best we could
Though these principles were advocated according
to the whim or liking of each of us, and though in Akron
and Cleveland they still stuck by the O.G. absolutes of
honesty, purity, unselfishness and love, this was the
gist of our message to incoming alcoholics up to 1939,
when our present Twelve Steps were put to paper.
I well remember the evening on which the Twelve
Steps was written. I was lying in bed quite dejected and
suffering from one of my imaginary ulcer attacks. Four
chapters of the book, Alcoholics Anonymous, had
been roughed out and read in meetings at Akron and New
York. We quickly found that everybody wanted to be an
author. The hassles as to what should go into our new
book were terrific. For example, some wanted a purely
psychological book which would draw in alcoholics
without scaring them. We could tell them about the "God
business" afterwards. A few, led by our wonderful
southern friend, Fitz M., wanted a fairly religious book
infused with some of the dogma we had picked up from the
churches and missions which had tried to help us. The
louder the arguments, the more I felt in the middle. It
appeared that I wasn't going to be the author at all. I
was only going to be an umpire who would decide the
contents of the book. This didn't mean, though, that
there wasn't terrific enthusiasm for the undertaking.
Every one of us was wildly excited at the possibility of
getting our message before all those countless
alcoholics who still didn't know.
Having arrived at Chapter Five, it seemed high
time to state what our program really was. I remember
running over in my mind the word-of-mouth phrases then
in current use. Jotting these down, they added up to the
six named above. Then came the idea that our program
ought to be more accurately and clearly stated. Distant
readers would have to have a precise set of principles.
Knowing the alcoholic's ability to rationalize,
something airtight would have to be written. We couldn't
let the reader wiggle out anywhere. Besides, a more
complete statement would help in the chapters to come
where we would need to show exactly how the recovery
program ought to be worked.
12
Steps in 30 Minutes
At length I began to write on a cheap yellow
tablet. I split the word-of-mouth program up into
smaller pieces, meanwhile enlarging its scope
considerably. Uninspired as I felt, I was surprised that
in a short time, perhaps half an hour, I had set down
certain principles which, on being counted, turned out
to be twelve in number. And for some unaccountable
reason, I had moved the idea of God into the Second
Step, right up front. Besides, I had named God very
liberally throughout the other steps. In one of the
steps I had even suggested that the newcomer get down on
his knees.
When this document was shown to our New York
meeting the protests were many and loud. Our agnostic
friends didn't go at all for the idea of kneeling.
Others said we were talking altogether too much about
God. And anyhow, why should there be twelve steps when
we had done fine on six? Let's keep it simple, they
said.
This sort of heated discussion went on for days
and nights. But out of it all there came a ten-strike
for Alcoholics Anonymous. Our agnostic contingent,
speared by Hank P. and Jim B., finally convinced us that
we must make it easier for people like themselves by
using such terms as "a Higher Power" or "God as we
understand Him!" Those expressions, as we so well know
today, have proved lifesavers for many an alcoholic.
They have enabled thousands of us to make a beginning
where none could have been made had we left the steps
just as I originally wrote them. Happily for us there
were no other changes in the original draft and the
number of steps stood at twelve. Little did we then
guess that our Twelve Steps would soon be widely
approved by clergymen of all denominations and even by
our latter-day friends, the psychiatrists.
This little fragment of history ought to convince
the most skeptical that nobody invented Alcoholics
Anonymous.
It just grew...by the grace of God.
Copyright © The A.A.
Grapevine, Inc.,
July 1953
|