|
by W.D. Silkworth,
M.D.
New York, New York
JOURNAL-LANCET, Vol.46, July, 1939
The beginning and subsequent development of a new
approach to the problem of permanent recovery for the
chronic alcoholic has already produced remarkable
results and promises much for the future this statement
is based upon four years of close observation. As this
development is one, which has sprung up among alcoholic
patients themselves and has been largely conceived and
promoted by them, it is felt that this new treatment can
be reported freely and objectively.
The central idea is that of a fellowship of
ex-alcoholic men and women banded together for mutual
help. Each member feels duty bound to assist alcoholic
newcomers to get upon their feet. These in turn work
with still others, in an endless chain. Hence there is a
large growth possibility. In one locality, for example,
the fellowship had but three members in September, 1935,
eighteen months later the three had succeeded with seven
more These ten have since expanded to ninety.
It is much more than a sense of duty, however,
which provides the requisite driving power and harmony
so necessary for success. One powerful factor is that of
self-preservation. These ex-alcoholics frequently find
that unless they spend time helping others to health
they cannot stay sober themselves. Strenuous, almost
sacrificial work for other sufferers is often imperative
in the early days of their recovery. This effort
proceeds entirely on a good will basis It is an
avocation. There are no fees or dues of any kind, nor do
these people organize in the ordinary sense of the word.
These ex-alcoholic men and women number about one
hundred and fifty. One group is scattered along the
Atlantic seaboard with New York as a center. Another,
and somewhat larger body, is locate in the Middle West.
Many walks of life are represented, though business and
professional types predominate. The unselfishness, the
extremes to which these men and women go to help each
other, the spirit of democracy, tolerance and sanity
which prevails, are astonishing to those who know
something of the alcoholic personality. But these
observations do not adequately explain why so many
gravely involved people are able to remain sober and
face life again.
The principle answer is each ex-alcoholic has had,
and is able to maintain, a vital spiritual or
"religious" experience. This so-called "experience" is
accompanied, by marked changes in personality. There is
always, in a successful case, a radical change in
outlook, attitude and habits of thought, which sometimes
occur with amazing rapidity, and in nearly all cases
these changes are evident within a few months, often
less.
That the chronic alcoholic has sometimes recovered
by religious means is a fact centuries old. But these
recoveries have been sporadic, insufficient in numbers
or impressiveness to make headway with the alcoholic
problem as a whole.
The conscious search of these ex-alcoholics for
the right answer has enabled them to find an approach,
which has been effectual in something like half of all
the cases upon which it has been tried. This is a truly
remarkable record when it is remembered that most of
them were undoubtedly beyond the reach of other remedial
measures.
The
essential features of this new approach, without
psychological embellishment are:
1. The ex-alcoholics capitalize
upon a fact, which they have so well
demonstrated, namely: that one alcoholic can
secure the confidence of another in a way and to
a degree almost impossible of attainment by a
non-alcoholic outsider.
2.
After having fully identified themselves with their
"prospect" by a recital of symptoms, behavior,
anecdotes, etc., these men allow the patient to draw
the inference that if he is seriously alcoholic,
there may be no hope for him save a spiritual
experience. They cite their own cases and quote
medical opinion to prove their point. If the patient
insists he is not alcoholic to that degree, they
recommend he try to stay sober in his own way.
Usually, however, the patient agrees at once. If he
does not, a few more painful relapses often convince
him.
3.
Once the patient agrees that he is powerless, he
finds himself in a serious dilemma. He sees clearly
that he must have a spiritual experience or be
destroyed by alcohol.
4.
This dilemma brings about a crisis in the patient's
life. He finds himself in a position, which, he
believes, cannot be untangled by human means. He has
been placed in this position by another alcoholic
who has recovered through a spiritual experience.
This peculiar ability, which an alcoholic who has
recovered exercises upon one who has not recovered,
is the main secret of the unprecedented success,
which these men and women are having. They can
penetrate and carry conviction where the physician
or the clergyman cannot. Under these conditions, the
patient turns to religion with an entire willingness
and readily accepts, without reservation, a simple
religious proposal. He is then able to acquire much
more than a set of religious beliefs; he undergoes
the profound mental and emotional change common to
religious "experience" (See William James' Varieties
of Religious Experience). Then too, the patient's
hope is renewed and his imagination is fired by the
idea of membership in a group of ex-alcoholics where
he will be enabled to save the lives and homes of
those who have suffered as he has suffered.
5.
The fellowship is entirely indifferent concerning
the individual manner of spiritual approach so long
as the patient is willing to turn his life and his
problems over to the care and direction of his
Creator. The patient may picture the Deity in any
way he likes. No effort whatever is made to convert
him to some particular faith or creed. Many creeds
are represented among the group and the greatest
harmony prevails. It is emphasized that the
fellowship is non-sectarian and that the patient is
entirely free to follow his own inclination. Not a
trace of aggressive evangelism is exhibited.
6.
If the patient indicates a willingness to go on, a
suggestion is made that he do certain things which
are obviously good psychology, good morals and good
religion, regardless of creed.
a.
That he make a moral appraisal of himself, and
confidentially discuss his findings with a competent
person whom he trusts.
b.
That he try to adjust bad personal relationships,
setting right, so far as possible, such wrongs as he
may have done in the past.
c.
That he recommit himself daily, or hourly if need
be, to God's care and direction, asking for
strength.
d.
That, if possible, he attend weekly meetings of the
fellowship and actively lend a hand with alcoholic
newcomers.
This is the procedure in brief. The manner of
presentation may vary considerably, depending upon the
individual approached, but the essential ingredients of
the process are always much the same. When presented by
an ex-alcoholic, the power of this approach is
remarkable. For a full appreciation one must have known
these patients before and after their change.
Considering the presence of the religious factor,
one might expect to find unhealthy emotionalism and
prejudice. This is not the case however; on the
contrary, there is an instant readiness to discard old
methods for new ones, which produce better results. For
instance, it was early found that usually the weakest
approach to an alcoholic is directly through his family
or friends, especially if the patient is drinking
heavily at the time. The ex-alcoholics frequently
insist, therefore, that a physician first take the
patient in hand, placing him in a hospital whenever
possible If proper hospitalization and medical care is
not carried out, this patient faces the danger of
delirium tremens, "wet brain" or other complications
After a few days' stay, during which time the patient
has been thoroughly detoxicated, the physician brings up
the question of permanent sobriety and,' if the patient
is interested, tactfully introduces a member of the
ex-alcoholics group. By this time the prospect has
self-control, can think straight, and the approach to
him can be made casually, with no intervention by family
or friends. More than half of this fellowship has been
so treated. The group is unanimous in its belief that
hospitalization is desirable, even imperative, in most
cases.
What has happened to these men and women? For
years, physicians have pursued methods, which bear same
similarity to those outlined above. An effort is being
made to procure a frank discussion with the patient,
leading to self-understanding. It is indicated that he
must make the necessary re-adjustment to his
environment. His cooperation and confidence must be
secured. The objectives are to bring about extraversion
and to provide someone to whom the alcoholic can
transfer his dilemma.
In a large number of cases, this alcoholic group
is now attaining these very objectives because their
simple but powerful devices appear to cut deeper than do
other methods of treatment because of the following
reasons:
1. Because of their alcoholic
experiences and successful recoveries they
secure a high degree of confidence from the
prospects.
2.
Because of this initial confidence, identical
experience, and the fact that the discussion is
pitched on moral and religious grounds, the patient
tells his story and makes his self-appraisal with
extreme thoroughness and honesty. He stops living
alone and finds himself within reach of a fellowship
with whom he can discuss his problems as they arise.
3.
Because of the ex-alcoholic brotherhood, the
patient, too, is able to save other alcoholics from
destruction. At one and the same time, the patient
acquires an ideal, a hobby, a strenuous avocation,
and a social life, which he enjoys among other
ex-alcoholics and their families. These factors make
powerfully for his extraversion.
4.
Because of objects aplenty in whom to vest his
confidence, the patient can turn to the individuals
to whom he first gave his confidence, the
ex-alcoholic group as a whole, or the Deity. It is
paramount to note that the religious factor is
all-important even from the beginning. Newcomers
have been unable to stay sober when they have tried
the program minus the Deity.
The mental attitude of the people toward alcohol
is interesting. Most of them report that they are seldom
tempted to drink. If tempted, their defense against the
first drink is emphatic and adequate. To quote from one
of their number, once a serious case at this hospital,
but who has had no relapse since his "experience" four
and one-half years ago:
"Soon after I had my experience, I realized I had
the answer to my problem. For about three years prior to
December 1934 I had been taking two and sometimes three
bottles of gin a day. Even in my brief periods of
sobriety, my mind was much on liquor, especially if my
thoughts turned toward home, where I had bottles hidden
on every floor of the house. Soon after leaving the
hospital, I commenced to work with other alcoholics.
With reference to them, I thought much about alcohol,
even to the point of carrying a bottle in my pocket to
help them through the severe hangovers. But from the
first moment of my experience, the thought of taking a
drink myself hardly ever occurred. I had the feeling of
being in a position of neutrality. I was not fighting to
stay on the water wagon. The problem was removed; it
simply ceased to exist for me. This new state of mind
came about in my case at once and automatically. About
six weeks after leaving the hospital my wife asked me to
fetch a small utensil, which stood on a shelf in our
kitchen. As I fumbled for it, my hand grasped a bottle,
still partly full. With a start of surprise and
gratitude, it flashed upon me that not once during the
past weeks had the thought of liquor being in my home
occurred to me. Considering the extent to which alcohol
had dominated my thinking, I call this no less than a
miracle. During the past your pears of sobriety I have
seriously considered drinking only a few times. On each
occasion, my reaction was one of fear, followed by the
reassurance, which came with my new found ability to
think the matter through, to work with another
alcoholic, or to enter upon a brief period of prayer and
meditation. I now have a defense against alcoholism
which is positive so long as I keep myself spiritually
fit and active, which I am only too glad to do."
Another interesting example of reaction to
temptation comes from a former patient; now sober three
and one-half years. Like most of these people, he was
beyond the reach of psychiatric methods. He relates the
following incident:
"Though sober now for several years, I am still
bothered by periods of deep depression and resentment. I
live on a farm, and weeks sometimes pass in which I have
no contact with the ex-alcoholic group. During one of my
spells I became violently angry over a trifling domestic
matter. I deliberately decided to get drunk, going so
far as to stock my guesthouse with food, thinking to
lock myself in when I had returned from town with a case
of liquor. I got in my car and started down the drive;
still furious. As I reached the gate I stopped the car,
suddenly feeling unable to carry out my plan. I said to
myself, at least I have to be honest with my wife. I
returned to the house and announced I was on my way to
town to get drunk. She looked at me calmly, never saying
a word. The absurdity of the whole thing burst upon me
and I laughed and so the matter passed. Yes, I now have
a defense that works. Prior to my spiritual experience I
would never have reacted that way."
The testimony of the membership as a whole sums up
to this: For the most part, these men and women are now
indifferent to alcohol, but when the thought of taking a
drink does come, they react sanely and vigorously.
This alcoholic fellowship hopes to extend its work
to all parts of the country and to make its methods and
answers known to every alcoholic who wishes to recover
as a first step, they have prepared a book called
Alcoholics Anonymous*. A large volume of 400 pages, it
sets forth their methods and experience exhaustively,
and with much clarity and force. The first half of the
book is a text aimed to show an alcoholic the attitude
he ought to take and precisely the steps he may follow
to affect his own recovery. He then finds full
directions for approaching and working with other
alcoholics. Two chapters are devoted to working with
family relations and one to employers for the guidance
of those who surround the sick man. There is a powerful
chapter addressed to the agnostic, as the majority of
the present members were of that description. Of
particular interest to the physician is the chapter on
alcoholism dealing mostly with its mental phenomena, as
these men see it.
By contacting personally those who are getting
results from the book, these ex-alcoholics expect to
establish new centers. Experience has shown that as soon
as any community contains three or four active members,
growth is inevitable, for the good reason that each
member feels he must work with other alcoholics or
perhaps perish himself.
Will the movement spread? Will all of these
recoveries be permanent? No one can say. Yet, we at this
hospital, from our observation of many cases, are
willing to record our present opinion as a strong "Yes"
to both questions.
JOURNAL-LANCET, Vol.46, July, 1939
Return
to main Dr.
Silkworth index page.
|